Gaza: The Deadliest Conflict for Journalists in Modern History
As of August 2025, multiple authoritative monitors record an unprecedented toll on journalists and media workers in Gaza. This article summarises what we know, why it matters to media professionals and commissioners, and how to plan safer assignments when standard insurance excludes war.
Executive summary
Independent research from Brown University’s Costs of War project states that the Gaza conflict has resulted in the highest number of journalist deaths recorded in any single conflict since modern record-keeping began. As of late March 2025 the report cites at least 232 journalists and media workers killed since 7 October 2023, with subsequent tallies from press freedom organisations and maintained name lists indicating the number has continued to climb through 2025.
1. The scale of loss
Numbers vary with cut-off dates and definitions, but the direction is consistent across credible monitors. Brown University’s The Reporting Graveyard (April 2025) synthesises historical baselines and conflict comparisons. CPJ, RSF and other monitors have repeatedly described the Israel–Gaza war as the deadliest conflict for journalists in their records.
Table 1 – Journalist deaths by conflict (verified baselines, best-available ranges)
Counts reflect available documentation and may differ by source methodology. Always check the “as of” date on cited sources.
Conflict | Deaths | Time period | Primary source |
---|---|---|---|
Gaza (Israel–Gaza war) | 232+ by late Mar 2025; rising through 2025 | Oct 2023 – Aug 2025 | Brown University Costs of War, RSF, Al Jazeera maintained list |
World Wars I and II (combined) | c. 69 | 1914 – 1945 | Brown University Costs of War |
Vietnam War | c. 63 – 71 | 1955 – 1975 | CPJ historical analysis |
Korean War | Single digits to low teens | 1950 – 1953 | Historical archives referenced in Brown |
Yugoslav Wars | c. 11 during major hostilities | 1990s | Contemporary press tallies referenced by Brown |
Afghanistan (post-9/11) | c. 80+ | 2001 – 2021 | UNESCO monitoring, CPJ |
2. Who is most at risk
The overwhelming majority of the dead are Palestinian journalists and media workers. Local reporters carry the heaviest risk burden: they live in the conflict zone, have fewer evacuation options, and often work as freelancers or fixers without the institutional protections of major newsrooms.
- Local casualties dominate – name lists show most victims are residents of Gaza working for local or international outlets.
- Freelancers and fixers – frequently first on scene, often with minimal safety nets.
- On-assignment deaths – many were killed while reporting, filming or travelling between locations.
3. Targeting, access and constraints
Multiple investigations and case files describe journalists being killed while clearly identified as press – wearing marked vests, operating near media tents or travelling in vehicles labelled PRESS. Alongside this are restrictions on foreign media entry, repeatedly cutting off outside scrutiny and placing the full burden of coverage on local journalists.
Table 2 – Injury and targeting indicators in Gaza
Indicator | Figure | As of date | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Journalists injured | c. 380 | Jan 2025 | Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, referenced by independent reporting |
Documented targeting incidents | Multiple case reports | 2023 – 2025 | Casework compiled by Brown University, CPJ and newsroom investigations |
Press facility and equipment destruction | Multiple incidents | 2023 – 2025 | RSF incident reporting and media investigations |
Foreign media access to Gaza | Severely restricted | 2023 – 2025 | RSF statements and coverage by international media |
4. Impact on press freedom
Fatalities do not tell the whole story. Sustained psychological trauma, the destruction of equipment and facilities, and repeated communications blackouts all degrade the ability to report. The result is a chilling effect on documentation just when credible reporting is most needed.
- Trauma and fatigue – journalists in Gaza document events while experiencing personal loss in real time.
- Operational attrition – loss of cameras, transmitters and vehicles raises costs and delays coverage.
- Blackouts – connectivity interruptions isolate reporters from editors, sources and audiences.
5. Duty of care and insurance that actually works
Standard travel policies typically exclude war, terrorism and civil unrest. In practical terms, that means many journalists discover at the point of claim that their policy does not respond to the event they faced. Specialist cover is different – it is designed for these realities and integrates with crisis response partners who operate 24/7.
What good cover looks like in conflict zones
- War and civil unrest included – no blanket exclusions for the very risks you face.
- Medical and security evacuation – documented pathways to extract teams when conditions deteriorate.
- Accidental death and disability – financial protection for families and dependants.
- 24/7 assistance – operators with real in-theatre capability, not voicemail.
- Support for local hires – parity of protection for fixers and freelancers.
Learn more about our specialist media cover and support:
- insuranceforthemedia.com – insurance for newsrooms, crews and freelancers operating globally
- Insurance for work and travel in Israel, Gaza and Palestine – background, guidance and enquiry route
- Contact us – talk to a specialist
- Get a quote – fast turnaround for urgent deployments
6. Impunity and accountability
UNESCO’s monitoring shows that the global impunity rate for killings of journalists remains stubbornly high – typically in the 80 to 90 percent range. Where impunity persists, risk rises. Calls for independent investigations into specific killings in Gaza continue, but progress has been limited.
Table 3 – Global press freedom risk indicators
Indicator | Latest figure | Scope | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Global impunity rate for journalist killings | c. 80 – 90% | Long-run average | UNESCO Observatory |
Israel–Gaza described as deadliest conflict for journalists since records began | Confirmed phrasing by multiple monitors | Conflict-specific | CPJ, Brown University, RSF |
Foreign press access to Gaza | Severely restricted | Conflict-specific | RSF, international media statements |
What to do next
If you commission or support journalism in conflict zones, take these steps before deployment:
- Confirm in writing that your insurance includes war, terrorism and civil unrest – and verify claim triggers.
- Ensure 24/7 medical and security evacuation are in place and tested with a pre-deployment call.
- Extend protections to local hires and freelancers at parity with staff correspondents.
- Agree communications and blackout protocols with clear check-in windows and fallbacks.
- Arrange hostile environment training and psychological support pathways.
Get a specialist quote or speak with our team about cover that works where others exclude.
Related links
FAQs
Does standard travel insurance cover journalists in war zones?
Usually not. Many policies exclude war, terrorism and civil unrest. Specialist cover that explicitly includes these risks is required for assignments in conflict zones.
Can local fixers and freelancers be insured on the same terms as staff correspondents?
Yes. We arrange cover that extends parity of protection to local hires and freelancers, including evacuation, accidental death and disability, and 24/7 assistance.
Do you support emergency evacuation from restricted or denied-access areas?
We partner with experienced operators who conduct medical and security evacuations worldwide, subject to on-the-ground conditions. Pre-deployment planning is essential to improve feasibility.